| Register | Forgot password?
Advanced Search

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

What about Ben Sheets?

Posted by MB21 on 11/12/08 at 12:05 PM • 67 Comments

Jerry Crasnick speculated that the Cubs could be interested in Ben Sheets if they weren’t able to trade for Jake Peavy or re-sign Ryan Dempster.  When you consider ballpark, Sheets was at least as good as Peavy in 2008.  His CAIRO projection in 2009 is a 3.61 ERA and his Bill James projection is 3.39.  He’s coming off an elbow injury, which is nothing new for him as he’s always coming off some kind of arm injury.  That might make him affordable though.  I have no idea what kind of offer it would take to get him, but with his injury history it won’t be nearly what he’s worth. 

If you sign Sheets to, say, a deal for something like 4 years and $65 million you get to keep the prospect you’d sent to San Diego and you’d get 2 draft picks for Ryan Dempster as well. 

What do you think?  How much money and how many years will it take? 

Save This Entry

 


Tags:

Related Entries

COMMENTS
Page 1 of 1 pages


1. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 01:47 PM

Bruce Miles joined Jim Memolo on WGN Radio Tuesday night and discussed the Peavy rumors. Miles said that Peavy has not officially signed his no-trade waiver and mentioned players such as Josh Vitters, Welington Castillo and Sean Marshall are possibly are on the table for Peavy. He added the Padres are into sluggers and pitchers and Felix Pie and Ronny Cedeno does not meet either of those descriptions.

Miles added the “ball is in the Padres court” and he thinks the Cubs offer is a good deal. Miles said the Cubs have money to play with the off-season but do have a budget and once the Peavy deal is done they still need to add a left-handed bat and a veteran in the bullpen. Miles thinks it will be hard for the Cubs to trade for Jake Peavy and resign Ryan Dempster. Miles finished with an interesting tidbit, “the Cubs would love to trade Jason Marquis.”
—chicagocubsonline

2. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 02:13 PM

The more I think, the less I like the Peavy deal.

3. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 02:32 PM

Lou was named NL Manager of the Year.

4. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 02:32 PM

The more I think, the less I like the Peavy deal.

False. The opposite is true.

5. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 02:34 PM

The more I think, the less I like the Peavy deal.

I’m not too worried about it. From everything I’ve read, from the mainstream anyway, it seems like the Padres prefer the Braves’ players to the Cubs.

I’d be surprised if the Cubs land him.

6. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 02:44 PM

sheets won’t get a 4 year deal, and if he does it is of the lohse variety.  my bet is he signs for 1/$12 or 2/$25 with the second year as his option

as much as it is fun to slot peavy into that rotation, i continue to not see the benefit of putting all of your chips to use in an area where you are fine and have cheaper options to get better.  if you can improve other deficiencies more with those prospects, its crazy.  i.e. if the same prospects improve RF or CF for than you improve your staff, then WTF?

7. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 02:46 PM

lou wins MOY

8. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:28 PM

You would have to be a bonafide idiot to offer Ben Sheets 4 years $65M

Not only do we already know this guy gets hurt every single year, but for god’s sake—he ended the 2008 season on the DL. That really should diminish his leverage considerably in contract discussions. I wouldn’t be the least bit shocked if Sheets was forced settle for only 2-3 years.

If you’re Hendry, and you’re already responsible for 2-3 scary lookin contracts (Soriano, Fukudome, Zambrano), would you really consider gambling $65M on a pitcher who’s viable to see DL time every single year of that deal?

What I really want to know is why isn’t there any buzz about Derek Lowe? This is a guy with tons of big game experience, whose style fits Wrigley Field perfectly, and who—at least in my opinion—could easily end up being a better pitcher than Dempster over the course of the next 3, 4 years. Lowe would take less years, less money, and presents almost no risk whatsoever.

I’d really like to hear one good reason why the Cubs shouldn’t go after Lowe…

9. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:32 PM

With the cash you’d save on choosing Lowe over Dempster, you could defintiely bring back Wood, and maybe even have enough cash left over so you wouldn’t have to “settle” for a second-tier RF option. Giles would probably be affordable in this scenario.

Yeah…. I’m definitely 100% on the Derek Lowe bandwagon.

10. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:32 PM

I’d really like to hear one good reason why the Cubs shouldn’t go after Lowe…

He’s me-first and a showboat.

Actually, I’m with you on that one. I’ve said before that I’d go after Lowe more than any other rumored pitcher.

11. Al Yellon (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:34 PM

All of these moves that you fellas mention are meaningless unless the Cubs add a Kevin Millar to platoon with Aubrey Huff at 1B.

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx

12. Al Yellon (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:36 PM

He’s me-first and a showboat.

There won’t be any of those kinds of ballplayers on my re-built Cub team.

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx

13. Al Yellon (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:38 PM

You would have to be a bonafide idiot to offer Ben Sheets 4 years $65M

Maybe true, but you must consider that I am the imaginary General Manager these days, so anything is possible in my world…

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx

14. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:40 PM

Miles finished with an interesting tidbit, “the Cubs would love to trade Jason Marquis.”

Interesting?  If I told you “I love to breathe air” would that qualify as interesting as well?  Seems more along the lines of ‘obvious’ instead.

As for the trade, the devil’s in the details.  I’m not sure this club has a can’t-miss prospect, maybe Vitters, but even he supposedly has a few holes in his game.  You hate to dump too many usable, ML-ready parts—the bullpen guys, maybe Pie because he’s cheap and useful, Marshall as depth for the rotation.  But if you start talking about guys further down the line, or guys who are blocked (like Castillo), voiding the system doesn’t concern me quite so much.

There aren’t too many guys of Peavy’s caliber floating around out there, and if you want to build a team that will win in October, you need those top-shelf players.  One of my favorite Bill James comments ever came after the ‘87 season, when he said something to the effect of “Whitey still doesn’t get it: in the playoffs, you need a #5 hitter more than you need a #5 starter.”  (Say what you want about James, but I will always hold him in high esteem based on his hatred of the Herzog-era Cardinals alone.) 

I’d still be willing to roll the dice in order to bring in another legit front-line starter.  If you have to blow too many resources—especially the ones that are useful now—to get him, yeah, you pass.  But your odds of winning a short series or two are pretty good with even a modestly competent offense if you have Z, Harden, and Peavy starting six of the seven games.  You can’t discount that too much.

It does beg the question, though—is Sheets or Sabathia in our price range?  If so, do we then sign one and turn around and make the deal to shore up SS or the outfield?  I dunno. 

I’m also curious as to whether the Padres will hang on until the deadline to flip Peavy, and what that will do to his price (and his willingness to accept a trade).  He might suddenly become more open-minded come June when his team is 20 games back in a very average division.  And for all of the talk of SD cutting payroll, he really doesn’t start to get expensive until after this year is up.  It makes me think that the Cubs or Braves would probably get him for their best price if they make the deal right now.

15. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:53 PM

I hate getting into this sort of discussion, but seriously—dont’ we at this point have to consider what these guys have done in big games? Going into next year, the Cubs figure to be odds-on favorites to win the Central again. But then what? Do we run out guys like Dempster and Peavy who haven’t proven they come up big when it counts the most, or do you run out Derek Lowe who I might add was the winning pitcher in ALL 4 of Boston’s clinching victories back in ‘04.

Again, I normally try and steer clear of the intangible, Kevin Millar type discussions, but I figure this stuffs should be icing on the cake I built earlier. Again—Lowe is an extremely low risk opprotuntiy who I think has a real good shot at being better than Dempster not only over the course of 3-4 years, but also when it counts the most: the postseason.

16. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 03:56 PM

All of these moves that you fellas mention are meaningless unless the Cubs add a Kevin Millar to platoon with Aubrey Huff at 1B.

And Luke Scott for the OF.

17. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 04:12 PM

We also need to find a way to trade for Matt Cain so we can trade him for Nolasco.

18. Al Yellon (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 05:25 PM

We also need to find a way to trade for Matt Cain so we can trade him for Nolasco.

I’m glad to see you are on board with my plans. Maybe I will reinstate you over at the Varsity Cubs Blog BCB.

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx

19. Al Yellon (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 05:28 PM

And Luke Scott for the OF.

I played Strat-O-Matic when I was a kid, my kid now is too into video games and longer hair, this is how I built the team that tore up my league. Stay tuned for another poll on whether or not my kid needs to get a haircut.

Also Lakeview Baseball Club better tear down that sign. That sign just pisses me off.

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx

20. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 05:34 PM

21. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 05:42 PM

FYI….  Just some data I got from a FOX Blog….  Any validity to this rumor or statement ????

I’m hearing that the third team involved in the Cubs trade for Peavy will be Baltimore. The Cubs want to land Peavy along with Brian Roberts and in order to do this and keep Dempster they will deal Zambrano to Baltimore for Roberts and 3 prospects that will be sent to San Diego for Peavy.

Another from that Blog….  News! The third team involved in the Jake Peavy trade is Baltimore. The Cubs are looking to aquire Brian Roberts (yes again) along with 3 minor league high prospects for Carlos Zambrano. Some of the prospects along with Ryan Theriot will then be dealt to San Diego for Jake Peavy.


????

22. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 06:11 PM

I might root for another team if Zambrano is traded for Roberts. Wow. That might be a first.

Anyway, Maddog, apparently there is a moran running for Senate in Kansas.

23. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 06:13 PM

But then what? Do we run out guys like Dempster and Peavy who haven’t proven they come up big when it counts the most, or do you run out Derek Lowe who I might add was the winning pitcher in ALL 4 of Boston’s clinching victories back in ‘04.

With that logic we should just go after Jeff Weaver and Jeff Suppan.

And to hell with Aramis Ramirez, what’s he ever done? Bring back Scott Brosius from the dead!

24. J (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 06:18 PM

Zambrano to the O’s???? Sounds like total bullshit.

25. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 06:50 PM

I’m hearing that the third team involved in the Cubs trade for Peavy will be Baltimore. The Cubs want to land Peavy along with Brian Roberts and in order to do this and keep Dempster they will deal Zambrano to Baltimore for Roberts and 3 prospects that will be sent to San Diego for Peavy.

A truckload of this shit could fertilize the Sinai. What tripe. I’m betting it was some O’s fan that wrote it, too. Those people think the sun rises and sets in the crack of Brian Roberts’ ass.

26. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:27 PM

You would have to be a bonafide idiot to offer Ben Sheets 4 years $65M

Not only do we already know this guy gets hurt every single year, but for god’s sake—he ended the 2008 season on the DL. That really should diminish his leverage considerably in contract discussions. I wouldn’t be the least bit shocked if Sheets was forced settle for only 2-3 years.

The only way Sheets takes a 1 or 2 year deal (or 3 years for that matter) is if he wants to turn that into more money sooner than he could with a 4 or 5 year deal.  He’s the 2nd best free agent pitcher available and will get paid accordingly.  Some time will be willing to give him 5 years and at least $75 million.  He threw about 200 innings in 2008 and while you know he’s going to miss some time, you also know he’ll give you about 150 innings or more and those 150 innings are going to be among the best in the game. 

I mentioned 4 years and $65 million because that’s essentially what Dempster and Peavy would get over that span.  By signing Sheets we take on a pitcher who is only slightly more injury prone than Peavy (and Dempster for that matter), save the prospects and get 2 draft picks.

Saving those prospects (Marshall alone) and the 2 draft picks more than makes up for the risk of signing Sheets to that kind of deal.

27. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:30 PM

I’m one who generally thinks no trade clauses are overblown because players waive them all the time, but why on earth would Zambrano waive his to go play for the Orioles?  We’re talking about a division that is stacked in talent with teams like the Red Sox, Rays, Yankees and Blue Jays who were one of the better teams in baseball in 2008.  There’s a better chance that Zambrano would waive his NTC to go play for the Royals than he would to go play for the O’s. 

Of all the things that make no sense, this makes the least.

28. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:34 PM

Jack, there are plenty of good arguments to make for why the Cubs should sign Lowe.  3-year deal (reportedly).  He’s very good.  Groundball pitcher in Wrigley Field.  However, none of the reasons have anything to do with his postseason success.  As already mentioned, if we were to play that game we could build a terrible team with players who played integral parts in their team’s championships. 

When the likes of David Eckstein, Jeff Suppan, Jeff Weaver, Darin Erstad,  Scott Brosius, and Dave Roberts can come up huge for their teams in the playoffs it says something.  It’s not saying that these players should be considered because of how they performed in October.  It says that in any given small sample size just about any thing can happen.  These guys are walking proof of that.

29. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:38 PM

As for the trade, the devil’s in the details.  I’m not sure this club has a can’t-miss prospect, maybe Vitters, but even he supposedly has a few holes in his game.  You hate to dump too many usable, ML-ready parts—the bullpen guys, maybe Pie because he’s cheap and useful, Marshall as depth for the rotation.  But if you start talking about guys further down the line, or guys who are blocked (like Castillo), voiding the system doesn’t concern me quite so much.

Good points and I’m not so concerned about emptying the system.  Teams in contention do that to improve their chances at winning in October and as Cubs fans we’ve berated this team in the past for not doing that.  No doubt Peavy is a top of the line pitcher and if the Cubs were to trade for him it would be hard for anyone, I think, to show how the deal wasn’t a good one for the Cubs.  He’s just that good.

30. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:41 PM

The Padres are idiots if they want sluggers. In that park, a slugger translates to a lot of long outs. Guys like Pie, speedy line drive hitters, are what they need, not bashers.

31. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:43 PM

Lou could be bullshitting, but he says he doesn’t know anything about the Peavy trade talks.  I’ve found Lou to be a straight-forward person in his 2 years as the Cubs manager so I’ve begun to take him at his word.  Doesn’t mean Hendry isn’t working on a deal, but Lou doesn’t know about it and clearly doesn’t think it’s an issue this team needs to address.  Then again, Hendry knows more about Dempster’s demands than Lou does, I’m sure.

http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2008/11/dday_for_big_un.html

32. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:45 PM

The Padres are idiots if they want sluggers. In that park, a slugger translates to a lot of long outs. Guys like Pie, speedy line drive hitters, are what they need, not bashers.

Yeah, when you look at what’s happened to Brian giles, it’s hard to comprehend why Towers would want the traditional sluggers.  Nothing wrong with having guys who can hit for power and have other offensive assets, but focusing only on players who can hit the ball out of the park in that place will only lead to failure.

33. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:48 PM

I hope the focus on getting a left handed hitter to play RF doesn’t stop this team from making other improvements if they make sense.  They seem so intent on improving one area that I worry that it could drag on and on only to see this team be left with the exact same team as last year, minus Dempster or Wood. 

Left handed bats are certainly nice and this team does need one, but a right handed bat would be just fine too in my opinion.

34. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:51 PM

I am really concerned about Peavy giving up 81 home runs in around 90 innings pitched on the road this season.  He only gave up 47 in Petco in over 100, so I am not real confident in what his success would be in Wrigley.  Having said that, I don’t want to see Ben Sheets and his consistently balky arm on the mound in a Cubs uni. How is he going to offer you anything more than Harden does?  You can’t afford two guys that aren’t going to take the ball every fifth day.  I am also afraid Dempster is going to return to his career norms so I’m hoping they let him walk.  All things considered, I still think trading for Peavy is the best option.

35. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:51 PM

Well, the one upgrade I wanted, defense at SS, isn’t going to happen. Signing Derek Lowe, for example, without addressing the crater of defensive suck at SS, is a self-defeating proposition.

36. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:55 PM

It’s probably just wishful thinking to hope for the Cubs to pick up Lowe and Furcal.

37. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:55 PM

If anyone is to believe Andy Dolan, the Cubs may be trading Theriot to San Diego.  I think the Padres would give the Cubs Jake Peavy so they didn’t have to take Theriot.

38. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:55 PM

Melissa, Peavy only gave 13 HR in 75 IP on the road last season.

39. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:56 PM

It’s probably just wishful thinking to hope for the Cubs to pick up Lowe and Furcal.


Probably, but that’s what the offseason is about, isn’t it?  Wishful thinking and a little does of reality once in awhile. 

Aren’t those home run numbers for Peavy in his career, Melissa?  I don’t think he could give up 81 home runs in 90 innings even if he pitched at some Little League field.

40. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:57 PM

I’d be very surprised if Theriot was dealt.

41. Harry Pavlidis (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 07:59 PM

Lowe would be a great pick-up.

I wish I spoke Spanish, because Zambrano is being interviewed in the booth at a game in Venezuela right now.

42. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:03 PM

That was career 81 on road and 47 at home.  I thought John Dewan said that was for the season when he was talking about it on the radio today.  Now that I think about it, it does seem excessive for one year.  Sorry about that.  I’ m still concerned that he will give up more home runs at Wrigley and all his road numbers are considerably higher than at home.

43. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:05 PM

Peavy’s career H/R splits:

Home—678 IP, 543 H, 209 ER, 47 HR, 195 BB, 717 K, 2.77 ERA

Road—583 IP, 546 H, 246 ER, 81 HR, 212 BB, 539 K, 3.80 ERA

They’re not horrific. In fact, they look very much like the H/R splits for one Rich Harden:

Home—339 IP, 257 H, 106 ER, 29 HR, 132 BB, 355 K, 2.81 ERA

Road—273.2 IP, 224 H, 114 ER, 18 HR, 130 BB, 257 K, 3.75 ERA

44. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:07 PM

HP, I’m sure someone around will have heard that and translate it for us.  I’ll look around later on.

Melissa, he’s undoubtedly going to give up more home runs away from PETCO, but keep in mind that players perform worse on the road so that career 3.77 ERA is probably a bit above what we should expect.  I’d venture a guess around a 3.35 or 3.45 ERA, which is very good.

45. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:08 PM

I wish I spoke Spanish, because Zambrano is being interviewed in the booth at a game in Venezuela right now.

I think he said something about him being a Catholic, and it’s a sin.

46. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:08 PM

It makes sense that they would be similar to Harden as he also pitched in a “pitcher’s park” in Oakland.  I like Peavy, I just don’t expect him to be as good at Wrigley.  I would rather they trade for him than re-sign Dempster.

47. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:09 PM

I don’t see Theriot getting dealt either, but one can dream.  Stop being a dream killer.

I’m pretty sure the Padres would much rather have Cedeno than theriot.

48. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:10 PM

I think he said something about him being a Catholic, and it’s a sin.

And he pointed to the sky when he was done.

49. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:15 PM

Z probably said something about God hating the Cubs and their fans.

50. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:15 PM

By the way, I just saw today that Mike Maddux is no longer the pitching coach in Atlanta.  He took a job for the Rangers.  Maddux was great for that staff in Milwaukee.  it’s going to be ugly for them.

51. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:16 PM

Z probably said something about God hating the Cubs and their fans.

So he’s kind of like Fred Phelps?

52. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:17 PM

Left handed bats are certainly nice and this team does need one, but a right handed bat would be just fine too in my opinion.

Well, if they wanted to get more lefty hitting in the lineup, they could slide DeRo over to short and play Fontenot at second vs. righties.  Doesn’t quite have the same panache as signing Milt Bradley, but it’s cheaper.

53. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:19 PM

So he’s kind of like Fred Phelps?

(dying) laughing

54. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:22 PM

Another thing to consider is that while Sheets definitely has injury issues, he has made 55 starts the last 2 years.

55. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:23 PM

I’d love to see the Cubs move DeRosa to shortstop.  There’s no possible way he could be as bad on defense as Theriot is.  He won’t be much better, but he won’t be that bad.  fontenot should get a lot of playing time next year vs. righties.

56. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:34 PM

You could put a BP net at SS and have it be as good or better than Theriot.

Okay, so he isn’t that bad, but he isn’t going to get better with age, and he was pretty damn bad already last season.

57. Harry Pavlidis (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 08:38 PM

OK, I didn’t see any of the game, except El Toro’s interview, as they called him, but I just saw a replay of Guzman giving up a home run and looking unhappy.  3-3 in the middle of the 6th.  I also saw Guzzie throw two very good pitches with ridiculous amounts of movement on them him.

58. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 10:04 PM

Guzman is being used as a starter isn’t he?  I don’t see him having any other role than as a reliever with the Cubs and he’ll probably do quite well with his stuff.  He’s a power righty and Lou loves those kind of guys.

59. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 10:53 PM

One thing I just thought of that hasn’t been mentioned yet is that the Cubs could trade Ted Lilly.  He’s basically a number 2/3 starter and compared to what other guys like that are making he’s a bargain.  He could probably bring back a couple of prospects and the Cubs could use those to either get Peavy or an outfielder.  Lou likes his lefties in the rotation so the Cubs could sign Andy Pettitte to take his place.  Thoughts?

60. Harry Pavlidis (view all comments) — Nov 12, 2008 @ 11:49 PM

“I’m 3-0 as a starter up there,” Grossman said. “I’m feeling pretty good about that stadium.”

idiot

61. Harry Pavlidis (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 12:00 AM

Guzman is being used as a starter isn’t he?

Yep, Four starts, 3 innings, 5, 5 and 6.  He should be a starter, he’s too good for the bullpen.  In his six innings, he gave up three runs.  One was unearned, and two were solo bombs to center by Miquel Montero. 

Thoughts?

No, I’d prefer they keep Lilly.  I’m actually not feeling the Peavy thing anymore.  For two reasons.  First, he’s going to cost too much talent and dough, and I don’t think it will be worth it.  Second, it looks like the Padres are ready to do the deal with the braves, per mlbtraderumors.com

62. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 12:09 AM

Lou likes his lefties in the rotation so the Cubs could sign Andy Pettitte to take his place.  Thoughts?

I think it’s unlikely.  From what I am gathering Hendry wants to build a dominating starting staff.  Which means trying to keep Dempster and then trading Marquis and replacing him.  I wouldn’t be shocked if they go after any of the other starters sans Sabathia.  I also won’t be surprised if they trade for Greene and also try to bring in Hermida or Swisher. 
If they let Wood go I would imagine they’ll try to bringin Cruz or Brandon Lyon or even Kevin Gregg.

63. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 08:30 AM

“I’m 3-0 as a starter up there,” Grossman said. “I’m feeling pretty good about that stadium.”

What a penis wrinkle. I bet he throws five picks on Sunday.

64. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 08:58 AM

Really nothing beyond “Jake wants to be in Chicago” and “Atlanta isn’t going to happen”. I have more to say, but the more I think about it the more it could hurt the Cubs chances of getting him. I’m a Cubs fan first and foremost so I will not risk reducing the Cubs chances of getting one of the best pitchers in MLB just to improve my credibility with the board as a whole.—NSBB poster who thinks he has a source, but will no longer have a source in a couple days

What could he possibly say that would hurt the Cubs chances of getting Peavy?  Do the people there actually believe this guy?  Amazing.

65. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 09:00 AM

He should be a starter, he’s too good for the bullpen.

I don’t think there’s any doubt he has the stuff to be a starter, but he doesn’t have the ability to stay healthy.  The way I see it is you let Guzman start and you probably get 4-6 starts from him, 10 if you’re lucky.  Or you put him in the bullpen where he could be a dominant late inning reliever who stays healthy.

66. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 09:19 AM

What a penis wrinkle. I bet he throws five picks on Sunday.

What did Rex say that was so wrong?  A reporter asks him about playing in Lambeau and he tells the guy that he’s had pretty good luck there in his career so he feels good about it?  I would think you statfaygs would appreciate Rex throwing his record at that stadium out there.

67. MB21 (view all comments) — Nov 13, 2008 @ 10:02 AM

I don’t really know anything about football, but 3 games is a small sample and one can only expect someone to play up to their true skill level each and every game, regardless of how they’ve performed in such samples in the past.  I have no idea if Rex is good or bad and to be honest I don’t care much, but from everything I’ve read around here and other places he sounds like a pathetic quarterback.

Page 1 of 1 pages


Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:



Next entry: Braves and Padres near deal for Jake Peavy

Previous entry: Bill James 2009 projections

ACB HOME, Previous Posts