| Register | Forgot password?
Advanced Search

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. -- Bruce Bartlett

Why Bobby Abreu wasn’t offered arbitration, revisited

Posted by MB21 on 01/06/09 at 03:39 PM • 126 Comments

A month ago I wondered how on earth Joe Sheehan could think that the Yankees not offering arbitration to Bobby Abreu wasn’t just a mistake, but the biggest mistake of the arbitration offering period.  Sheehan stated that “in almost all cases” it favors offering arbitration to the player, which is nonsense and it doesn’t address specifically why he felt not offering Abreu arbitration was such a bad move by the Yankees. 

First of all, it ignores Bobby Abreu’s diminished skills, which we have talked about here more than enough.  It also ignored Abreu’s past salary ($16 million in 2008).  If he was offered arbitration, Abreu could earn no less than a 10% pay cut from his 2008 salary, or best case scenario would have been a 2009 salary of $14.4 million.  That’s only about $6 or $8 million more than he is actually worth.  Offering a player like Bobby Abreu arbitration would be the sign of an incompetent organization, which Sheehan said he considered that arbitration period to be a litmus test of except he said players should be offered arbitration.  Players should only be offered arbitration if they are going to be worth the salary that they most likely will earn.  Bobby Abreu will not be.  This was a very good decision by the Yankees.  After all, Abreu is worth all of 0.7 wins in 2009, or less than $5 million. 

Now consider that free agents like Ibanez and Burrell and Dunn were expecting to get lots of money this offseason.  Ibanez and Burrell have signed for $10 million per year (same as Milton Bradley) and Adam Dunn isn’t finding too many teams interested in his services, which is good since he’s not going to be worth what he gets paid either.  I don’t know if Ibanez or Burrell are better than Abreu (they’re probably the same) and Dunn is pretty much equal to him while Milton Bradley is better than all of them.

Think about that.  If the Yankees offered arbitration they would be stuck paying a guy at least 50% more than other free agent outfielders who are equal to Abreu have gotten.  The Yankees can afford this for sure, but why waste money that doesn’t need to be spent?  It would have been insane for the Yankees to offer him arbitration.  He’s simply not worth anywhere near what he would have earned had he accepted it. 

Save This Entry

 


Tags:

Related Entries

COMMENTS
Page 1 of 1 pages


1. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:41 PM

Hey, do you have a source for the 10% pay cut thing, Maddog? I just took a look at the CBA and I can’t find it.

2. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:53 PM

(dying laughing), okay, I’m at the new thread now. The question is, do I pick up a bomber of Arrogant Bastard Ale for tonight, or do I try something new?

3. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:55 PM

If they sold Arrogant Bastard where I lived I wouldn’t drink anything else.

4. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:55 PM

A lot of folks seem rather enamored of Abreu. I don’t get it. He’s likely the worst defensive OF in the game, or at least the worst of the regulars and his HR numbers have dipped considerably. He’s a good hitter, solid OBP, but he’s not worth the price he wants.

5. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:56 PM

Jame Gumb, it seems like you’re obsessed with that site.

All I do is post stuff about BCB. I contribute nothing else. And it seems like you’re a great big, fat person.

6. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:56 PM

The question is, do I pick up a bomber of Arrogant Bastard Ale for tonight, or do I try something new?

If you can get Two Brothers Cane and Ebel, get a bomber of that; otherwise, you really can’t go wrong with Arrogant Bastard.

7. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:57 PM

All I do is post stuff about BCB. I contribute nothing else.

Keep wishing we were the SBNation Cubs blog, loser.

8. J (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:57 PM

I tried Arrogant Bastard Ale on New Years. It was ok.

9. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:58 PM

A lot of folks seem rather enamored of Abreu. I don’t get it. He’s likely the worst defensive OF in the game, or at least the worst of the regulars and his HR numbers have dipped considerably. He’s a good hitter, solid OBP, but he’s not worth the price he wants.

Most of them probably just know his name and maybe remember that he hit a fuckload of HRs in the 2005 HR derby. Selective memory bias, I’d guess.

10. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:59 PM

The question is, do I pick up a bomber of Arrogant Bastard Ale for tonight, or do I try something new?

11. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 04:59 PM

Unfortunately, I’m back in VA, and I can’t find Two Brothers out here. I’m also kinda mad at myself for not trying Founders Breakfast Stout while I was in Chicago. Three Floyds Alpha King was excellent, however. Now I really wish they distributed out here.

12. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:00 PM

(dying laughing)

13. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:01 PM

I can’t find Two Brothers out here

Have you looked at Whole Foods?

14. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:02 PM

Man, HG, you really like Grain Belt. It’s almost like ccd’s and my obsession with the Old Style.

15. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:03 PM

Abreu has to be one of the few players that has gone from completely under-rated to completely over-rated within a few years.  Strange indeed.

16. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:03 PM

Have you looked at Whole Foods?

Yeah, Whole Foods is where I get most of my beer, at least when I’m in DC on the weekends. There’s also a really good liquor store in Chevy Chase that lets you buy singles. But alas, neither of them had anything from Two Brothers or Founders. At least I can find Bells and Stone.

17. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:04 PM

Abreu has to be one of the few players that has gone from completely under-rated to completely over-rated within a few years.

Yeah, it’s like his popularity grew as his skills diminished. It’s a reverse Frank Thomas.

18. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:04 PM

Grain belt might be my favorite domestic beer (non-micro brew).  The new owners (and brewery) have done a great job.  I just can’t believe they decided to keep the name, that couldn’t have seemed like a lucrative marketing decision at the time.

19. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:05 PM

Bells

They’ve got the Kalamazoo Stout out over here. Tasty.

20. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:06 PM

Grain belt might be my favorite domestic beer (non-micro brew).  The new owners (and brewery) have done a great job.  I just can’t believe they decided to keep the name, that couldn’t have seemed like a lucrative marketing decision at the time.

Schlitz just did the same thing when they went back to the old formula, and Old Style is going back to full krausening, but changing nothing else. Seems like a trend among some older, more recognizable brews.

21. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:07 PM

They’ve got the Kalamazoo Stout out over here. Tasty.

That one’s good. Have you tried their Expedition Stout? Not quite as good as North Coast Old Rasputin, but a little bolder and a little more alcoholic. Of course, I’ve never had Dark Lord, so my RIS experience is incomplete.

22. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:10 PM

I can’t find Two Brothers out here

That’s Al Yellon’s kind of place!

23. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:14 PM

That’s Al Yellon’s kind of place!

(dying laughing). This is the worst thing every done on this site.

24. ccd (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:18 PM

Grain Belt will be a wpbc beer o’ the week the next time I hit MN.

25. ccd (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:19 PM

  I can’t find Two Brothers out here

Have you looked at Whole Foods?

or Trader Joe’s

26. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:20 PM

I’ve never had Dark Lord

Nectar. Of. The. Gods.

27. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:22 PM

Nectar. Of. The. Gods.

Yeah, when the wife and I can settle down in Chicago, I’m going to have to go to Binny’s or something for Dark Lord day. I hear people line up for it, some even through the night.

28. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:31 PM

Dark Lord day

You can only buy it at the brewery now on Dark Lord Day (last Sat in April), cash only and limited to 6 bottles per customer.

29. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:33 PM

All I do is post stuff about BCB. I contribute nothing else.

Well that’s clear.  So you’re a gimmick poster then?  A sockpuppet?

And it seems like you’re a great big, fat person.

When in doubt, flail wildly I suppose.

30. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:34 PM

Ah, so that’s Dark Lord Day. Sounds like reason enough to make a roadtrip when I can get back to Chicago…sad that that won’t be for a few years.

31. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:35 PM

Well that’s clear.  So you’re a gimmick poster then?  A sockpuppet?

Actually, JG (along with Sam) is our resident minor league guru. He and Sam should be reviewing the SS’s soon, if I remember correctly.

32. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:36 PM

Sounds like reason enough to make a roadtrip when I can get back to Chicago

That’s my b-day weekend, so I’m trying to put something together.

33. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:36 PM

There’s a great article up on Sabernomics covering the Burrell signing as well.

It’s interesting to see the market taking a nose dive for the services of some of these guys.  One thing I can’t help but wonder, and Bradbury doesn’t really touch on this: are teams getting better at defensive valuation?

It would explain the lack of interest in guys like Burrell and Dunn (though not in Ibanez, who was overpaid) if teams now are able to get a better idea of just how much their poor defense would cost them.

34. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:39 PM

It would explain the lack of interest in guys like Burrell and Dunn (though not in Ibanez, who was overpaid) if teams now are able to get a better idea of just how much their poor defense would cost them.

Apparently teams don’t buy into Three True Outcomes.

35. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:41 PM

It’s interesting to see the market taking a nose dive for the services of some of these guys.  One thing I can’t help but wonder, and Bradbury doesn’t really touch on this: are teams getting better at defensive valuation?

It would explain the lack of interest in guys like Burrell and Dunn (though not in Ibanez, who was overpaid) if teams now are able to get a better idea of just how much their poor defense would cost them.

I think that’s definitely part of it, but I think it has most to do with the economic climate. The Big Lead had a writeup about this and they made the interesting point that just last winter Aaron Rowand (vastly overrated defender) and Torii Hunter (solid, if a bit overrated, defender) got huge deals, yet comparable sluggers are getting lesser deals this offseason. In more lush economic times, I think we’d see these guys getting bigger deals, but I also think that you’re onto something with the defense angle. I do think teams are beginning to understand that there are two ways to make a club better: score more runs, or give up fewer runs, and I think they’re also beginning to understand that some players just can’t outhit their defensive gaffes.

36. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:43 PM

That Burrell deal is a pretty shrewd deal for TB. It would be about right for an NL team, because his defense significantly lowers his value. In the AL, however, he can sit and hit; Pat Burrell could be deadly as a DH.

37. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:44 PM

It would explain the lack of interest in guys like Burrell and Dunn (though not in Ibanez, who was overpaid) if teams now are able to get a better idea of just how much their poor defense would cost them.

I think some teams were waiting to see if a market price would be established by other free agents or perhaps some teams leaking offers.  But since some of the market price establishers (i.e. Yankees, Red Sox, Cubs) seem to be done spending, Dunn might be out in limbo.  He’s not going to get what he was originally hoping he would get.  He’ll probably end up signing for a lot less than a lot of teams thought he would cost.

Bradley signing 3/30 certainly didn’t help Dunn’s case.

38. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:46 PM

Vlad, it’s possible they changed that rule a few years ago if you aren’t able to find it.  I’ll look later on.  The point still stands though.  Arbitrators aren’t going to give any player significant pay cut.  I’d be surprised if arbitrators had given him anything less than what he made in 2008.

Wreckard, thanks for the link to JC’s article.  One thing I should mention is that JC and most sabermetricians strongly disagree on the value of players.  JC thought the ibanez deal was a good one and nearly every sabermetrician found it to be a laughable deal. 

Also, teams are definitely improving when it comes to evaluating defense.  There are reliable metrics around and teams have their own statisticians doing some work as well and the defensive metrics, while they’ll never be as “good” as the offensive ones, are becoming quite reliable.  There’s no reason any more to ignore defense because it’s become relatively easy to quantify with the play by play logs as well as the people who are employed to plot exactly where balls where fielded and how hard they were hit (these are used for systems like UZR and PMR, I believe).  So there’s a great deal of data.  There’s also some inconsistency and the people who created those metrics (UZR is the best by far) will tell you that you need 3 years of data to know if one year’s numbers are reliable.  For example, if you have Bobby Abreu being at -20, -16, and -25 and then he’s -1, something was more than likely wrong with the data for that -1 season, but you can’t ignore it either.  You’d have to regress it with past seasons and by doing so you still end up with Abreu being about a -20 fielder (these numbers I just made up though Abreu probably is a -20 fielder).

39. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:46 PM

I do think teams are beginning to understand that there are two ways to make a club better: score more runs, or give up fewer runs, and I think they’re also beginning to understand that some players just can’t outhit their defensive gaffes.

Ryan Howard, anyone?

I think the team that signs Dunn will be a team looking to put him at 1st base. (or DH)

40. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:47 PM

Dunn might be out in limbo.  He’s not going to get what he was originally hoping he would get.  He’ll probably end up signing for a lot less than a lot of teams thought he would cost.

I wonder if the Angels might look at him to replace Tex.

BTW, the Bears just shitcanned their LB, D-Line, and DB coaches.  Lovie is going to fire everybody he can to save Babich.

41. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:49 PM

That Burrell deal is a pretty shrewd deal for TB. It would be about right for an NL team, because his defense significantly lowers his value. In the AL, however, he can sit and hit; Pat Burrell could be deadly as a DH.

Except DHs have less overall value than someone who plays the field.  An average hitting outfielder who plays average defense was likely to be a better signing than Burrell, or at least be of more value to the Rays.  But, and I think this is what you may have meant and I’m just an idiot, the Rays have a shitload of outfielders so they don’t need another one.

That being said, the concept is still true that a DH is really not as valuable as some think.  Not saying you think they are, but I know some people think that because so and so hits the crap out of the ball it must mean he’s valuable (see Dunn, Adam).

42. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:52 PM

I think there is a huge difference in knowledge between the front offices and people like the fans and media.  I know nobody was saying otherwise, but fielders like McLouth are always going to be considered good by the majority of people because, you know, he won a gold glove award, which is all most people need to reach a conclusion.  I’m pretty sure the Pirates front office would tell you that Nate McLouth is a horrible defender. 

What I think is a positive is that sooner than later this knowledge will break through into the media (it’s already begun) and will break through into the broadcast booths (some players have already talked about advanced stats and these are the future broadcasters). When that happens the level of discourse will improve whereas right now we’re arguing against people who have opinions and are in no way interested in ever changing them no matter how much evidence one may provide to support their claims.

43. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:54 PM

the Rays have a shitload of outfielders so they don’t need another one.

Yeah, that was my thought. Burrell can sit the bench and go .280/30/100 without costing the Rays runs with his awful defense. But your point about DH’s being less valuable is well taken. I hadn’t considered that.

44. ccd (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:55 PM

Lovie is going to fire everybody he can to save Babich.

un-fucking-real. he fired chico for that assclown.

45. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:57 PM

Nate McClouth is a pretty mediocre OF. Some of the routes he takes in Cf are, to say the least, very interesting.

(some players have already talked about advanced stats and these are the future broadcasters). When that happens the level of discourse will improve whereas right now we’re arguing against people who have opinions and are in no way interested in ever changing them no matter how much evidence one may provide to support their claims.

I can only hope you’re right. The state of baseball discourse now is pretty shoddy.

46. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 05:58 PM

un-fucking-real. he fired chico for that assclown.

Yeah, and now, if he hires Marinelli, who has been offered a job by the Bears, he’s got a hard choice to make. But only for Lovie, because Marinelli is a good defensive coach, miles better than Babich. You can Babich, hire Marinelli and tell Lovie to get his hand out of the DC’s cookie jar.

47. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:02 PM

Carl Pavano————>Cleveland

48. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:05 PM

Vlad, it’s possible they changed that rule a few years ago if you aren’t able to find it.  I’ll look later on.  The point still stands though.  Arbitrators aren’t going to give any player significant pay cut.  I’d be surprised if arbitrators had given him anything less than what he made in 2008.

Yeah, the point was mostly academic, I just couldn’t find the rule anywhere. For players who aren’t free agents there’s protection on how much of a pay cut you can give them, but I don’t think there is for free agents anymore. But like you said, an arbitrator probably wasn’t going to give him a pay cut. And the way the system is set up, it would be an unacceptable risk to hope the arbitrator would.

49. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:12 PM

marinelli to be the d-line coach is what i heard? hilarious

i hate the bears and the bulls right now….....both are run by non-competent poops or nincompoops

i’m glad mcphail left just in time, hendry is showing to be anything but incompetent right now

50. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:15 PM

marinelli to be the d-line coach is what i heard? hilarious

He was offered the job, but Seattle will offer him more money and the DC position, and he’ll take it.  The Bears won’t offer him that for two reasons: Lovie is wedded to Babich, and the Bears are too fucking cheap.

51. J (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:23 PM

un-fucking-real. he fired chico for that assclown.

The whole Bear FO is a complete joke.

52. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:47 PM

Fucking Babich!!  He took a once feared defense and turned them into shit in 2 years.  Somebody on a Bears site said it’s not Babich’s fault, that the defense got too old.  Huh?  The oldest guy on the D is Wale and he’s only 31.

53. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:54 PM

Yeah, the point was mostly academic, I just couldn’t find the rule anywhere. For players who aren’t free agents there’s protection on how much of a pay cut you can give them, but I don’t think there is for free agents anymore. But like you said, an arbitrator probably wasn’t going to give him a pay cut. And the way the system is set up, it would be an unacceptable risk to hope the arbitrator would.

Yeah, I think you’re right.  I get the two mixed up sometimes.  As we agreed, no arbitrator is going to significantly reduce his salary if a team offers him arbitration.

54. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 06:57 PM

Somebody on a Bears site said it’s not Babich’s fault, that the defense got too old.

This is why I stay away from football blogs. The BEars defense failed for three reasons: poor play at the d-line and at safety and an inflexible scheme. They play cover-2. In that scheme you must get pressure from your front 4 and your safeties must be very good in coverage. Mike Brown is a very good 4-3 safety; in the cover-2, he’s slightly above average. Daniel Manning, Kevin Payne and Steltz are just plain bad. They are poor tacklers, do not read and react well and don’t know the coverages. So, you get no pass rush, at all, from the front 4, couple it with inept safety play, and add to those to the fact that the league has figured out the cover-2 and will tear it apart with 12-15 yard slants and TE routes up the seam, and you have the 2008 Bears defense.

55. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 07:03 PM

e-mail, MD

56. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 07:53 PM

e-mail, MD

ditto

57. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 09:13 PM

Michael Vick anybody?

Since the issue of character has come up recently, it has reminded me of the Vick thing, and if any NFL team will ever take him anytime soon, or if ever. Would you want him on your team? Just a thought. Discuss.

58. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 09:20 PM

Pretty sure Slezak’s crazy to think Vick won’t be suspended for at least a year after his release, and she’s also crazy to think he’s going to be in playing shape when he gets out.

Oh, also, even if he were in playing shape and were eligible to play, he’d be getting out about 40 days before the start of the season. He’s never been a very good passer to begin with, and the Bears have never had a QB like him. So the Bears would have to assess where he’s at physically when he gets out, figure out their offensive scheme, and teach it to him in that time.

Basically, what I’m saying is, they might as well stick with Orton for next season over trying the Vick thing.

59. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 09:49 PM

yeah, no way he plays for the Bears, at least in the next few years, and for anybody in the NFL in the next 2, really. Just wondering what people thought about him playing for your favorite team at some point. I guess it depends on what he does with his life in the coming 2-3 years, and what I was getting at too was how do we treat this guy? We all think killing dogs is deplorable so should that be a “banishable” offense? It’s a hard question for me to even answer so I was just asking others.

60. snley (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 09:49 PM

Fucking Babich!!  He took a once feared defense and turned them into shit in 2 years.  Somebody on a Bears site said it’s not Babich’s fault, that the defense got too old.  Huh?  The oldest guy on the D is Wale and he’s only 31.

Babich certainly deserves quite a bit of blame for the craptitude of the last couple seasons, but the D started sliding during the second half of the Super Bowl season.  While many attributed it to the loss of Mike Brown, they could no longer stop the run.  The team was lucky to get by the Seahawks and the Saints in the playoffs.  Then Manning let Addai and Rhodes tear them apart.  It’s crazy that a defense that was so dominant for a season and a half could suddenly turn to crap.  I’ve wanted Lovie as head coach since the year they hired Juaron, but I don’t know if I can handle another season like the last 2 1/2.

61. snley (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 09:54 PM

We all think killing dogs is deplorable so should that be a “banishable” offense?

In my book, any physical crime against another human trumps anything done to an animal.  If he can’t play, throw out any player ever convicted of assault.  While what Vick and his friends did is disturbing to think about, was it really that much worse than what the animals that end up on our dinner tables went through?

62. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 09:59 PM

Tommie Harris is the biggest reason the Bears defense has struggled.  It began declining in 06 after he and Brown got hurt.  He hasn’t been the same player since.  If anyone noticed in games where he played well this season and got pressure up the middle it changed everything.  He has obviously been hampered by injuries and you could say the same of Urlacher and Mike Brown.  I also agree that the safeties are atrocious.  I do think Babich is kind of unimportant though as it’s really Lovie’s defense and the scheme isn’t a problem if you have good healthy players to operate within it.  Angelo needs to take blame for not drafting better defensive players over last 3 years.

63. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:05 PM

In my book, any physical crime against another human trumps anything done to an animal.  If he can’t play, throw out any player ever convicted of assault.  While what Vick and his friends did is disturbing to think about, was it really that much worse than what the animals that end up on our dinner tables went through?

I was hoping to get this view also. It breaks it WIDE open when you go this route. I’m not a vegetarian but I can understand it. You can do it for health reasons or on principle. I don’t kill animals myself because I just can’t bring myself to do it and it’s no fun for me anyway, but I’m not exactly condemning others either. For some reason we treat dogs much more like humans than any other animal in our culture (except in that small culture Vick was in)

64. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:09 PM

I would have to disagree that processing animals for consumption is akin to dog fighting.  Animals are treated in a plausibly humane manner in order to be made into food products.  Dog fighting is absolute torture of those animals and extremely inhumane.  It is cruel and unusual behavior.  Now I don’t think it’s as terrible as harming people either so it doesn’t have to fit into one category or the other to me.  Vick has every right to be able to find employment in the NFL after he serves his time.

65. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:11 PM

I actually probably have more of a problem with people cruel to animals than people cruel to other people (at least in a broad sense). To be clear, I’m not one of those holier than thou PETA types, but I’m a misanthrope, so I really don’t care about most people.

66. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:17 PM

You can say you do it for health reasons, but there’s really nothing healthy about not eating meat.  If there was wouldn’t more professional athletes be vegetarians?  How many athletes can you name that are?  Probably just Prince Fielder, and he’s not exactly the epitome of good health.  I don’t hunt either, but I feel bad for people who don’t eat meat because they heard it might be good for them to avoid it.  If it’s for principal, then by all means don’t eat meat.

67. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:21 PM

To be clear, I’m not one of those holier than thou PETA types, but I’m a misanthrope, so I really don’t care about most people.

This made me chuckle.  In fact, I’m still chuckling.

I think that describes a lot of people, because as much potential as humans have, we sure are a stupid species.

68. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:35 PM

I think that describes a lot of people, because as much potential as humans have, we sure are a stupid species.

Have you ever seen Idiocracy? I don’t think it’s at all accurate, but it’s pretty funny nonetheless.

69. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:47 PM

You can say you do it for health reasons, but there’s really nothing healthy about not eating meat

depends on the person and how much they consume. I wasn’t making a blanket statement. For a person with obvious hereditary heart problems it’s probably wise to limit the animal fat, but that’s between the person and their doctor or whatever.

Melissa, I think there’s a case against factory farming.. chickens pecking each other to death, cows and other animals cramped and slaughtered, etc… but I’m with Perkins and I think there are bigger issues so I don’t really get into that.

My point was just hiring Vick as a your QB. I noticed a lot of people feel the same way about him as they do about Bradley for some reason and I though it an interesting topic.

70. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 10:57 PM

While I agree about the point about Vick’s treatment of animals, and the treatment of other people being more important, (like the whole fucking Cinncinati Bengals team for instance), it should be pointed out that part of the reason Michael Vick is serving a prison sentence has less to do with treatment of animals and more to do with running a high-dollar gambling ring from his garage.  While the morality issues of this (if thre are even any- I don’t personally see anything wrong with it except that the dogs were pretty much tortured as the object of the “bets”), running such a gambling ring is against the law.  Still, that doesn’t compare on a moral grounds way with the mistreatment of another person, its just that the gambling thing is why he’s doing time.

71. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:02 PM

I’m a misanthrope, so I really don’t care about most people.

This reminded me about a friend of mine who once described me as a misanthropic baseball fan.

I don’t think he knew me that well, or did he? (dying laughing)

72. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:09 PM

depends on the person and how much they consume. I wasn’t making a blanket statement. For a person with obvious hereditary heart problems it’s probably wise to limit the animal fat, but that’s between the person and their doctor or whatever.

I know, I didn’t think you were making a blanket statement and my response also didn’t include people with hereditary health issues.  Clearly there are some benefits from not eating meat.  You’ll have lower cholesterol when your older and probably live longer if you avoid meat your whole life (of course you’d also have to avoid alcohol and tobacco and high fructose corn syrup).  Basically you’d sacrifice the current health benefits of eating meat for a chance of living to 100 instead of 90.  And frankly, if I make it past 70 I’ll be very disappointed.

Back on track.  Michael Vick.  Didn’t he serve a 2 year prison sentence?  Rapists get less time than that.  As far as I’m concerned his punishment is complete and if he’s in any shape to play football, he should be allowed.

Editor’s note:  I love dogs.  I’m a dog owner and always have been.  The dogs he raised and fought and killed are not Lassie, or Rin Tin Tin.  They are fighting breeds specifically bred and raised to fight.  They weren’t domesticated creatures.  I think it’s wrong and I don’t condone it, but I’m pretty sure he learned his lesson by now.

73. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:13 PM

good point Don. That part is not forgotten but people would be more inclined to forgive an illegal gambling thing (unless it pertains to the sport like Pete Rose) than a seemingly immoral animal torture culture, in which he played a big part.

74. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:13 PM

Have you ever seen Idiocracy? I don’t think it’s at all accurate, but it’s pretty funny nonetheless.

I have not.  I just did a quick search and it seems like something I’d enjoy.  Mike Judge was the director, and Beavis and Butthead were responsible for at least half of my criminal record.  I’ll give it a shot (if it’s available via netflix).  Boosh.

75. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:16 PM

Michael Vick anybody?

In in favor of the Cubs signing him.  Maybe Al will officially give up and find another team to root for.

76. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:16 PM

I actually think running a big-money gambling ring is a good reason why someone shouldn’t be let back into a sport. It raises questions, anyway.

Also, Vick is serving more than a rapist might because rape is usually a state crime and running a big money gambling ring is a federal crime, and the penalties for federal crimes are usually steeper.

Finally, TheVan, I think you need to read up on pit bulls more, and how someone trains a dog to fight, because what you just said about Vick’s dogs is patently false.

77. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:19 PM

While what Vick and his friends did is disturbing to think about, was it really that much worse than what the animals that end up on our dinner tables went through?

No, absolutely not!  I don’t condone what Vick did or even what Ramirez does in the offseason though with Ramirez one has to consider that it’s legal in his nation and culturally acceptable.  It’s not in the US and Vick went to prison.  I think he belonged there as well.  But, anyone who wants to say that animal cruelty is an offense that should not allow one to return their previous line of work had better be a vegetarian because they are condoning much worse animal cruelty than what Vick is guilty of.

78. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:20 PM

Finally, TheVan, I think you need to read up on pit bulls more, and how someone trains a dog to fight, because what you just said about Vick’s dogs is patently false.

False.  Unless you mean he borrowed someone’s pet and trained it to fight.  Then your statement would be true.  What I said means that from the time these dogs are born they are never intended to be anyone’s pet.  Unless that’s what you mean as well.  And if that’s the case, than, well…false.

79. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:22 PM

Back on track.  Michael Vick.  Didn’t he serve a 2 year prison sentence?  Rapists get less time than that.  As far as I’m concerned his punishment is complete and if he’s in any shape to play football, he should be allowed.
Editor’s note:  I love dogs.  I’m a dog owner and always have been.  The dogs he raised and fought and killed are not Lassie, or Rin Tin Tin.  They are fighting breeds specifically bred and raised to fight.  They weren’t domesticated creatures.  I think it’s wrong and I don’t condone it, but I’m pretty sure he learned his lesson by now.

I think that’s very logical reasoning Van

80. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:22 PM

I’m not a vegetarian but I can understand it. You can do it for health reasons or on principle.

I wouldn’t call myself a vegetarian though many of my friends would.  I don’t eat much meat.  I rarely put anything on the menu that includes meat, but will eat it if we go out to dinner or if we a large group of people over (family dinners or something).  I don’t do it on principle.  I just feel much better not eating meat.

81. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:26 PM

You can say you do it for health reasons, but there’s really nothing healthy about not eating meat.  If there was wouldn’t more professional athletes be vegetarians?

It depends on what other foods you incorporate into the food you prepare.  The vitamins and minerals we get from meat is found in other products.  If you just eat carrotts and celery you are going to become very unhealthy, but I think most vegetarians understand cooking more than the average person.  Making vegetarians dishes requires more knowledge of not just flavors that go together, but knowledge in how you supplement the loss of meat in your diet. 

I cook dinners for my wife and children and while I make the kids something different each night, they have had and have liked some of the meals I prepare for my wife and I.  And it’s something I’m expecting them to eat as hey grow up.  I will not put their health at risk, or mine for that matter.

82. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:27 PM

I actually think running a big-money gambling ring is a good reason why someone shouldn’t be let back into a sport. It raises questions, anyway.

good point as well

83. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:28 PM

Melissa, I think there’s a case against factory farming.. chickens pecking each other to death, cows and other animals cramped and slaughtered, etc… but I’m with Perkins and I think there are bigger issues so I don’t really get into that.

And how about the treatment of baby cows just so we can have some super tender non-colored meat?  They suspend these animals without the ability to move because they don’t want the muscles to get stronger.  That is some fucked up cruelty.

84. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:30 PM

My point was just hiring Vick as a your QB. I noticed a lot of people feel the same way about him as they do about Bradley for some reason and I though it an interesting topic.

It is interesting, but I don’t think Bradley compares to Vick.  He hasn’t been in prison…yet.  If some fan goes after him, he might end up there though.

85. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:33 PM

I wouldn’t call myself a vegetarian though many of my friends would.  I don’t eat much meat.  I rarely put anything on the menu that includes meat, but will eat it if we go out to dinner or if we a large group of people over (family dinners or something).  I don’t do it on principle.  I just feel much better not eating meat.

I feel the same way and even more as I get older and don’t get the rigorous exercise I used to get. I can’t run anymore because of my knees but I’ve started walking about 90 minutes a day because half of that includes my commute to work so it’s pretty easy.

I feel so much better when I don’t eat meat or other animal fats. Just the way it is. I’ve accepted it even though I crave bad foods sometimes.

86. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:33 PM

I actually think running a big-money gambling ring is a good reason why someone shouldn’t be let back into a sport. It raises questions, anyway.

Did it have anything to do with football though?  If it didn’t, I don’t see a problem with it. 

Vick is a piece of shit.  No doubt.  I think he served his sentence and should be able to return to whatever it is that he wants to do.

87. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:34 PM

It is interesting, but I don’t think Bradley compares to Vick.

Judging by how some fans are reacting towards the Cubs signing Bradley you’d think he compared to someone like Vick.

88. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:34 PM

And how about the treatment of baby cows just so we can have some super tender non-colored meat?  They suspend these animals without the ability to move because they don’t want the muscles to get stronger.  That is some fucked up cruelty.

agreed

89. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:34 PM

Cruel practices can be invoked in creating veal and that is one reason I personally choose not to consume it.  I am also aware that there are factory farming practices that really should not be allowed because they are cruel to animals.  I grew up on a farm and you will never convince me that training dogs to attack and kill each other in the most gruesome possible fashion is the same as raising cattle and hogs for slaughter.  There is a difference.

90. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:35 PM

I feel so much better when I don’t eat meat or other animal fats. Just the way it is. I’ve accepted it even though I crave bad foods sometimes.

Sometimes it’s worth it just to satisfy those cravings.  A couple weeks ago I had a craving for a snickers bar and I went up and bought 2 of the king size ones.  I ate them both that night.  I ran for an extra 10 minutes each day for about a week.

91. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:36 PM

Fair enough, melissa.

92. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:37 PM

It is interesting, but I don’t think Bradley compares to Vick.  He hasn’t been in prison…yet.  If some fan goes after him, he might end up there though.

I’m hoping Bradley hits a big HR in the first home game like Fukudome did so the dumbass fans won’t even be given the chance. I don’t think Bradley will be like anybody is making him out to be but that would be a cool way to start things off.

93. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:38 PM

I feel so much better when I don’t eat meat or other animal fats.

I’m the exact opposite.  A couple years back my wife wanted me to try a diet she saw on TV called the fat smash diet.  For the first month you only eat fruits and vegetables, then you start incorporating other things back into your diet gradually.  It got to the point where I couldn’t go to the gym, do basic cardio, etc. because I was so drained.  Some things just affect people in different ways.

94. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:39 PM

Sometimes it’s worth it just to satisfy those cravings.  A couple weeks ago I had a craving for a snickers bar and I went up and bought 2 of the king size ones.  I ate them both that night.  I ran for an extra 10 minutes each day for about a week.

you runners can get away with a lot. fuckers!

95. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:41 PM

I’m hoping Bradley hits a big HR in the first home game like Fukudome did so the dumbass fans won’t even be given the chance.

Looking back now I wish Fukudome hadn’t hit that home run.  It’s probably the reason the same dumbass fans gave him a free pass through his entire second half suck fest.

96. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:43 PM

TheVan, generally, “domesticated” refers to a species, not individuals. Pit bulls are domesticated. You also said these dogs are not Lassie or Rin Tin Tin. And a number of Vick’s dogs have been rehabbed to my understanding. And pit bulls make perfectly fine pets.

I also think the notion that I see reflected in certain posts here, that you can’t condemn what Vick did and eat meat is just flat stupid. Aside from the fact that you can do your best to eat meat that was raised in more humane ways, I think there’s a valid distinction to be made between causing suffering for sustenance and causing suffering for sport.

All that said, I don’t think dog fighting is such a heinous crime that someone should be unemployable for doing it. But it’s still pretty twisted.

97. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:49 PM

TheVan, generally, “domesticated” refers to a species, not individuals. Pit bulls are domesticated. You also said these dogs are not Lassie or Rin Tin Tin. And a number of Vick’s dogs have been rehabbed to my understanding. And pit bulls make perfectly fine pets.

I kind of thought that’s probably what you were referring to.  But I wasn’t referring to pit bulls or certain breeds, just the dogs themselves at the dog fighting compound.  I know that pitbulls can be fine pets, but the fighting dogs at the fighting camp (not the breeds in general), were not raised to walk along side humans as companions, or to be domesticated.  From basically the moment they’re weened from their mother they’re trained to fight.

Also, I said I don’t condone what he did, not condemn.

98. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:51 PM

True. Sorry, I’ve seen plenty of people try to minimize this as somehow totally ok because it’s just his property, and I just assumed that’s where you were going, and I think I was just reading old arguments I’ve read before into what you were writing when I shouldn’t have.

99. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:51 PM

All that said, I don’t think dog fighting is such a heinous crime that someone should be unemployable for doing it. But it’s still pretty twisted.

yeah, it’s twisted alright. I can’t imagine what kind of person thinks it’s OK to do that shit but people do that to other humans so there you go. Insanity.

100. vladimir (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:53 PM

yeah, it’s twisted alright. I can’t imagine what kind of person thinks it’s OK to do that shit but people do that to other humans so there you go. Insanity.

So far as I can tell, if you think it’s ok to do that to other humans you get to be a law prof at Berkeley and write articles in the New York Times.

101. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 06, 2009 @ 11:54 PM

True. Sorry

That’s okay, it’s not the first time you’ve flown off the handle at me, and it likely won’t be the last.  I get pretty stubborn once the season starts.

102. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:00 AM

So far as I can tell, if you think it’s ok to do that to other humans you get to be a law prof at Berkeley and write articles in the New York Times.

I must’ve missed that when I was at the Dominican cockfighting championship series.

103. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:00 AM

For the first month you only eat fruits and vegetables, then you start incorporating other things back into your diet gradually.  It got to the point where I couldn’t go to the gym, do basic cardio, etc. because I was so drained.

I think those kinds of diets are dangerous.  There’s likely a very easy explanation for why you felt that way and I’d guess it was that the only carbs you were getting was from the fruit.  I’m betting you didn’t get enough carbs.  I don’tknow though.

104. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:03 AM

I also think the notion that I see reflected in certain posts here, that you can’t condemn what Vick did and eat meat is just flat stupid. Aside from the fact that you can do your best to eat meat that was raised in more humane ways, I think there’s a valid distinction to be made between causing suffering for sustenance and causing suffering for sport.

But one doesn’t need to cause suffering to the animals for sustenance.  Eating meats is a sport, Vlad.  It’s not so much of one these days of course, but any animal you eat suffered at some point.  I don’t disagree that there is a big difference between what Vick did.  I just think it’s a rather fine line.

105. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:08 AM

I think those kinds of diets are dangerous.  There’s likely a very easy explanation for why you felt that way and I’d guess it was that the only carbs you were getting was from the fruit.  I’m betting you didn’t get enough carbs.  I don’tknow though.

Actually, through supplementation I was able to keep myself at about a 60/30/10 carb/protein/fat (though I agree that most of my carbs were likely sugar based).  I’m pretty conscious about my nutrition for my running and cycling.  Had to eat a lot of beans for protein.  I just think my body reacts differently to plant proteins than it does to meat proteins.

106. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:09 AM

Looking back now I wish Fukudome hadn’t hit that home run.  It’s probably the reason the same dumbass fans gave him a free pass through his entire second half suck fest

I agree. He didn’t even have a good first half. It was more like a good first third wasn’t it? I remember that moment very well and it was exciting as hell. It probably had more to do with Gagne pitching than Fukudome hitting, though (dying laughing)

Too bad the cubs lost that game. Fun way to start the season.

107. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:11 AM

And please don’t mistake my comments as belittling what Vick did.  He broke the law.  Plain and simple.  I just think that what he did is far from so awful that he should be banned or even suspended from football for any amount of time.

108. MB21 (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:12 AM

Actually, through supplementation I was able to keep myself at about a 60/30/10 carb/protein/fat (though I agree that most of my carbs were likely sugar based).  I’m pretty conscious about my nutrition for my running and cycling.  Had to eat a lot of beans for protein.  I just think my body reacts differently to plant proteins than it does to meat proteins.

Good thing you were taking supplements.  Most people would see that diet and not even bother.  Something in your body needs the protein and fat that my body dislikes.  Strange how something works for one but not the other.

109. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:17 AM

I just think my body reacts differently to plant proteins than it does to meat proteins.

yeah, me too. I need to have a little meat because too many beans for protein or too many carbs in general cause me problems. It’s a shitty balancing act I have to follow all the time. Very annoying. I always have to make sure to eat plenty of the right fruits and veggies and know which ones to avoid. It’s a pain. Not every day but most of the time.

110. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:21 AM

Most people would see that diet and not even bother.

I wouldn’t have bothered, but my wife wanted me to try it.  She has the metabolism of a greyhound and eats nothing but junk all day and manages to stay around 105-110.  Then I pick up some of her eating habits and I gain 30 pounds and it takes me a year to get rid of it.  If there’s one thing I remember from being a vegetarian for a month, man was I gassy.  My kids thought I was the funniest man on the planet (flatulence is humorous when you’re 2 and 3).  That’s what happens when you try to get all your proteins from beans, you end up getting way too much fiber.

111. Horny Goat (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:25 AM

we’re gonna have to call this blog something else if we keep going on about fiber and beans and shit. I blame this whole thing on me. It’s the worst thing I’ve ever done on the history of this day.

112. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:30 AM

i have nothing to add to this mess.

113. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 12:55 AM

If I have to hear one more time about how Marquis is a good fifth starter I’m going to scream.

114. Faith Plus One (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:09 AM

Had it not been because of Fukudome (apparently) we wouldn’t have to deal with Bradley.

I find it rather sad that there cannot be a simple clean slate with regards to Milton Bradley in Chicago I don’t know. Why every single mentally retarded fan feels the need to act holier-than-thou?

What is amazing is the fact that if half the assholes who have shit to say would do any research whatsoever they would shrivel up and die. It feels like it wouldn’t even stop then. I can’t speak for much of any other fan base, but it simply feels like to me Cub fans are fucking children. The one thing that bothered me the most was the fact some assholes at BTI were taking solace in the fact that Bradley is going to get heckled. That’s a great idea, fuckin’ idiots, then when all is said and done and Bradley (inevitably) backlashes as his personality dictates, you can then cry about him being a mouthy nigger. (Right Al?) What wouldn’t suprise me, is to see these assholes (mind you I’m talking both fans and media) run Bradley out of town.

My only hope for Milton Bradley, and really the only thing I can see stopping each and every assfuck douche in Chicago is to see him hit a homerun in the bottom of the ninth to send the Cubs to the World Series. Then again, who am I kidding? Even if he bats .250 in the series he’ll be made into a demon.

I love Chicago, I love this city. I just cannot stand the plethora off mouth breathing stupid fucks that inhabit this city.

115. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:14 AM

strange night at the Trib.  Van Dyke discusses Hendry saying the Cubs want to add another starter before the season. He goes on to mention Lowe and Pettite as possible targets with the usual Peavy rumor.
THEN of all beat-writers Morrissey writes how Bradley’s emotional play is what the Cubs team need and he can back it up because he’s actually good.

116. Faith Plus One (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:15 AM

If I have to hear one more time about how Marquis is a good fifth starter I’m going to scream.

Is it the ‘good’ part you take exception to? He’s a little below your standard run of the mill fifth starter as far as I’m concerned,  -.58 in ‘08, -.83 in ‘07. Not worth the amount of money he was given, at all. I wouldn’t by any means call him ‘good’, I would agree.

117. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:16 AM

Had it not been because of Fukudome (apparently) we wouldn’t have to deal with Bradley

So in a way I guess we should be thankful Fukudome sucked ass last year.  If he rebounds in his sophomore year than we be even more thankful.

118. Faith Plus One (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:18 AM

So in a way I guess we should be thankful Fukudome sucked ass last year.  If he rebounds in his sophomore year than we be even more thankful.

Mind you this was per BTI, so take it for what it’s worth. Nothing.

119. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:28 AM

Is it the ‘good’ part you take exception to? He’s a little below your standard run of the mill fifth starter as far as I’m concerned,  -.58 in ‘08, -.83 in ‘07. Not worth the amount of money he was given, at all. I wouldn’t by any means call him ‘good’, I would agree.

It’s such a stupid way of looking at it. Let’s say a guy IS the best fifth starter in the majors. That would mean, what, only 100-120 starting pitchers in the majors are better than him? Oh look out!

For fuck’s sake, it’s like watching the Cy Young award being handed out by a panel kindergarten teacher. Jason Marquis isn’t suddenly a good pitcher because you’re only comparing him to other shitty pitchers.

120. Faith Plus One (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 01:38 AM

It’s such a stupid way of looking at it. Let’s say a guy IS the best fifth starter in the majors. That would mean, what, only 100-120 starting pitchers in the majors are better than him? Oh look out!

I like how Al mentions his OPS+ the last few years has been 99 and 101 or whatever. That’s fuckin’ wonderful Al, these pitchers are a dime a fuckin’ dozen.

Looking the WAR that I posted too, there were much much better options. What they were at the time I don’t know, I’m too lazy to do research.

121. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 08:00 AM

vick didn’t just fight dogs, he took them to the lake and drowned them.  he broke their necks in his own hands.  i’ll let the lawyers figure out what that deserves and when he should get out.  i’ll make my decision that if he went to the bears I’m done with them, and I would be done with them even if he didn’t suck so much.  lets assume he was actually good, and that being in prison for 2 yrs didn’t slow him down….sports is fun for me, and i have no desire to get nauseas every time I look at the field.  not worth the Ws. 

I believe the NFL is not your ordinary place of work for a number of different reaasons, and that they have the right to suspend him for a year+ post him getting out of jail.  i do believe after he is punished he has the right to return, if someone wants to employ an individual that disturbed.  On the flipside, it is beyond me that leonard little can kill someone after multiple dui’s and be back in the league.  try rooting for that guy.

i watch sports to enjoy them

122. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 08:04 AM

if bradley hits .280 and with power and doesn’t eat someone’s face off fans will not give him any static.  all of the press will turn to the new story…how bradley has changed, matured, fits in, is a leader with some fire in a listless clubhouse…these things come in waves, and most reporters are biased and/or are lemmings.  racists are racists, that will never change…but the liberal press will absolutely rotate to the feel good reclamation project when he plays well and doesn’t break any dog necks.

123. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 08:06 AM

who would you rather have - derosa?  or fukudome and the 3 arms?  i ask this because you have to believe hendry looked to move fuku as well.  considering the savings on derosa ex miles is only like $2-$3mm a year, can we assume the only bidders for fuku were $8-$9mm below his salary level?  oh man i hope he comes out better this year.

124. (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 08:24 AM

who would you rather have - derosa?  or fukudome and the 3 arms?  i ask this because you have to believe hendry looked to move fuku as well.  considering the savings on derosa ex miles is only like $2-$3mm a year, can we assume the only bidders for fuku were $8-$9mm below his salary level?  oh man i hope he comes out better this year.

I can’t imagine anyone would take Fukudome without the Cubs eating a significant portion of his salary, which would somewhat defeat the purpose of trading him in the first place.

125. Mercurial Outfielder (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 08:43 AM

NEW THREAD UP.

126. Jame Gumb ® (view all comments) — Jan 07, 2009 @ 09:03 AM

I have nothing to add today except a few stupid BCB posts:

Wood and DeRo
For those of you who are lamenting Kerry’s departure, I’m not sold that we should’ve paid $10MM/year for a mediocre closer. He blew 15% of his saves and walked/hit quite a few per 9……he was hardly the real deal. While I realize Gregg is not perfect either, I like the “strategy” of moving Marmol to close and using Gregg as set up while saving some $$$. Spellcheck could also set up Marmol-let’s not forget, if Gregg is a bust.

Additionally, DeRosa had a CAREER year last year and turns 34 before the season starts. I don’t think it’s a bad sell high move, although I can see some “complaints” about the prospects we received in return. I’m holding judgment until we see if these players get packaged in another deal coming. Bottom line, I can see some sound rationale to the trade…
by jballgame on Jan 6, 2009 6:16 PM CST reply   1 recs


Let’s look at Wood’s walks and Gregg’s.
Wood: 66.1 IP, 18 BB, 7 HBP
Gregg: 68.2 IP, 37 BB, 4 HBP

Now, tell me again that Gregg has better control than Wood.

Oh, and Gregg blew 24% of his save opportunities.

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jan 6, 2009 8:04 PM CST up reply   0 recs


He never said Gregg was better than Wood.
He was saying Wood is about league average for a closer (and I don’t know if this is true or not)
by GoCubbies34 on Jan 6, 2009 8:43 PM CST up reply   0 recs


No, but he implied Wood walked a lot of people and Gregg doesn’t.
Which isn’t true.

“That’s my opinion and if you don’t like it, well, I have others.” ~ Groucho Marx
by Al on Jan 7, 2009 4:41 AM CST up reply   0 recs

Someone needs to explain the difference between imply and infer to Al…

Page 1 of 1 pages


Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:



Next entry: The Scrap Heap

Previous entry: Milton Bradley, In His Own Words

ACB HOME, Previous Posts